![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Женщина погибла на глазах у детей во время традиционного купания в крещенской проруби
TG Link
A woman died in front of her children during the traditional ice-hole bathing on Epiphany.
TG Link
Confusion over Artificial "Intelligentness" stems from wrong scientific worldview which is now adopted as ‘legal’. Any concept is flawed because a description is a model. And the accuracy and adequacy of a model is not a matter of conception, but knowledge. Knowledge means conscious personal experience. And the more conscious a person is (~ awareness, mindfulnes), the more accurate their knowledge is — especially if concerned the questions related to humans and life itself.
The scientific approach inherently excludes such things as consciousness, and therefore there is a fundamental misunderstanding of the difference between consciousness and intelligence. When a person has the experience of distinction between them, he gets a new worldview. And this worldview contains no contradictions as regarded the issues of AI and "understanding".
Может ли машина понимать? Что есть истинное понимание?
Путаница в вопросах «разумности» ИИ упирается в неверные представления об устройстве мира и человека. Любые представления небезупречны, потому что они есть описание / модель. А точность и адекватность модели – не вопрос представлений, это вопрос знания. Знание же есть осмысленный опыт. И чем более осознан человек, тем точнее его знание – в том, что касается вопросов, связанных с человеком и жизнью как таковой.
Из научного подхода изначально исключены такие вещи, как сознание, и поэтому имеет место принципиальное непонимание природы сознания и различия сознания и ума. Когда человек имеет опыт их различения, ему открывается другая картина мира. И что важно – в ней сразу снимаются противоречия вокруг ИИ и «понимания».
Re: https://ivanov-petrov.livejournal.com/2627112.html?thread=289241640#t289241640Если мы нормальные люди, мы все хотим добра. Для себя и для ближних. И нас в мире больше. Тогда – откуда берётся зло?
Всем этим темам был посвящён блог, содержание которого перенесено сюда из LJ. И он больше похож на неполный набор паззла с отсутствующей цельной картинкой. Это сделано не намеренно – ответы на сложные вопросы требуют места, изменение себя – усилий.
IN ENGLISH:
If we are usual human beings, we all wish well to ourselves and people around. And we are the majority. Then, why so much evil around?
These were the items covered in the LJ blog, now transferred to DW. It is some kind of a puzzle set, incomplete and with no key integral picture. I had no intention to hide something, but basic items require a large context, and the changes of Self imply efforts.
upd 26 01 07
HAPPY NEW YEAR!
Jan. 1st, 2026 03:10 pmFirst of all, HAPPY NEW YEAR to all who reads me here after the forced but soft landing following the unexpected “improvements” of the LJ administration. I don’t want to give them an excuse, but we know too little on if they had a choice. The users did have, and it was my decision to cancel all LJ posts except the farewell post with a short summation for the period since 2021:
«… Over these years I've tried to share my experience and knowledge – or at least a competent content with the readers. The theme was always the same: the Path – to the Self, to Truth of reality. Where to begin, how to make first steps. And those who had tried, learned by experience both the difficulties and the efficiency of their attempts. …»
The “Seekers After Truth” are rare, and I never tried to increase the number of subscribers, as never refused to help those who tried to make the first steps inside.
I am grateful to this site provided us the new home and I will try to open a new page here with the description of basic statements in English version too – if time and circumstances allow )
«… Over these years I've tried to share my experience and knowledge – or at least a competent content with the readers. The theme was always the same: the Path – to the Self, to Truth of reality. Where to begin, how to make first steps. And those who had tried, learned by experience both the difficulties and the efficiency of their attempts. …»
The “Seekers After Truth” are rare, and I never tried to increase the number of subscribers, as never refused to help those who tried to make the first steps inside.
I am grateful to this site provided us the new home and I will try to open a new page here with the description of basic statements in English version too – if time and circumstances allow )
